Dogs have always been treasured pets, and for Christians, the Bible offers thoughtful perspectives on these beloved animals. Although the Scriptures don’t extensively discuss dogs, they provide valuable insights into our responsibility towards animals and the importance of kindness. Looking at Bible verses related to dogs can enhance our appreciation of their role in our lives and emphasize principles of compassion and stewardship.
These verses remind us of our special connection with our pets and encourage us to care for them in a way that reflects our faith. By considering these biblical views, Christians can deepen their understanding of honouring and nurturing their furry companions.
Bible Verses About Dogs
1. Proverbs 26:11
Like a dog that returns to its vomit is a fool who repeats his folly. (ESV)
This verse uses the behaviour of a dog to illustrate the foolishness of repeating the same mistakes. Just as a dog’s action of returning to vomit is both repulsive and pointless, so is the repeated folly of a person who fails to learn from their errors. The comparison highlights the lack of wisdom in not learning from past actions, portraying it as both unwise and unproductive.
In ancient times, dogs were often seen as symbols of undesirable traits, and this metaphor reinforces the idea of foolishness through vivid imagery. By likening repetitive foolishness to a dog’s behaviour, the verse effectively communicates the importance of learning and growth.
2. Matthew 7:6
“Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you.” (ESV)
In this passage, Jesus uses the term “dogs” metaphorically to represent those who are unworthy of receiving valuable or sacred things. The instruction is to avoid sharing what is precious with those who will not appreciate or respect it, symbolised by the dogs and pigs. This highlights the need for discernment in distributing wisdom and values, ensuring that one’s efforts are not wasted on those who will not understand or value them.
The use of “dogs” here reflects the idea of individuals who, due to their lack of appreciation or respect, are not fit to receive sacred teachings. It serves as a caution against the misuse of valuable resources and the potential harm of sharing them with those who are incapable of valuing them.
3. Philippians 3:2
“Look out for the dogs, look out for the evildoers, look out for those who mutilate the flesh.” (ESV)
Paul warns the Philippians about individuals he refers to as “dogs” and “evildoers,” using these terms to describe false teachers and those who distort the Gospel. By employing this imagery, Paul underscores the seriousness of the threat posed by such people, who are characterised by their harmful practices and deceit. The term “dogs” conveys a sense of contempt and danger, emphasising the need to be vigilant against those who seek to undermine true teachings.
This passage reflects the prevalent view of dogs as symbols of impurity and danger, reinforcing the idea that false teachers are to be avoided and exposed. It serves as a stern warning to remain steadfast in the faith and cautious of those who may lead others astray.
4. Revelation 22:15
“Outside are the dogs and sorcerers and the sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices falsehood.” (ESV)
In Revelation 22:15, “dogs” are listed among those who are excluded from the holy city, representing individuals characterised by immoral and deceitful behaviours. The term “dogs” here symbolises those who live contrary to the values and standards of the holy realm, highlighting their exclusion from the divine promise. This use of “dogs” reflects the broader biblical theme of separating the righteous from the unrighteous.
The image of dogs in this context underscores the severity of living in opposition to God’s commands. By associating “dogs” with various forms of wrongdoing, the verse starkly contrasts the purity expected in the holy city with the impurity of those who reject it.
5. 1 Kings 14:11
“Anyone belonging to Jeroboam who dies in the city the dogs shall eat, and anyone who dies in the open country the birds of the heavens shall eat, for the Lord has spoken it.” (ESV)
This verse from 1 Kings 14:11 uses the imagery of dogs to depict a grim fate for those associated with King Jeroboam. The promise that dogs will consume the bodies of those who die in the city illustrates the total devastation and dishonour awaiting those who fall out of favour with God. It serves as a powerful symbol of the consequences of disobedience and the severity of divine judgement.
The imagery of dogs eating the dead underscores the lack of honour and respect for the deceased, highlighting the gravity of the punishment. This stark portrayal reflects the harsh reality of divine retribution for turning away from God’s ways.
6. Psalms 22:16
“For dogs encompass me; a company of evildoers encircles me; they have pierced my hands and feet.” (ESV)
In this psalm, “dogs” metaphorically represent hostile and malevolent individuals surrounding the psalmist. This imagery conveys the intense suffering and isolation experienced, with “dogs” symbolising those who threaten and cause harm. The verse vividly describes the feeling of being besieged by evil forces, reflecting a deep sense of distress and vulnerability.
The reference to dogs in this context amplifies the psalmist’s anguish and the perceived threat from those who seek to harm. It serves to highlight the severity of the situation and the psalmist’s desperate plea for deliverance from those who bring suffering and adversity.
7. Isaiah 56:10
“His watchmen are blind; they are all without knowledge; they are all silent dogs; they cannot bark, dreaming, lying down, loving to slumber.” (ESV)
Isaiah uses the term “dogs” to describe unfaithful or ineffective leaders, portraying them as lacking vigilance and responsibility. These “silent dogs” are characterised by their failure to perform their duties and their preference for inactivity over vigilance. This metaphor underscores the disappointment in leadership that fails to protect or guide effectively.
The imagery of dogs in this passage criticises the leaders for their lack of action and oversight, contrasting their behaviour with the expected vigilance of a true watchman. It highlights the consequences of failing to uphold one’s responsibilities and the negative impact of such failures on the community.
8. Exodus 11:7
“But not a dog shall growl against any of the people of Israel, either man or beast, that you may know that the Lord makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel.” (ESV)
In Exodus 11:7, the term “dog” is used to signify the protection and distinction made by God between the Israelites and the Egyptians. The absence of even a growl from a dog illustrates the peace and safety granted to the Israelites amidst the plagues affecting Egypt. This differentiation underscores God’s special care and favour towards His people.
The reference to dogs in this context highlights the miraculous nature of the protection provided to the Israelites. It emphasises the clear separation made by God between His chosen people and those under judgment, reinforcing the divine promise and deliverance.
9. Deuteronomy 23:18
“You shall not bring the fee of a prostitute or the wages of a dog into the house of the Lord your God in payment for any vow, for both of these are an abomination to the Lord your God.” (ESV)
In Deuteronomy 23:18, “dog” is used symbolically to refer to male temple prostitutes, reflecting the disreputable nature of such practices. The verse prohibits bringing such tainted money into the temple, emphasising the need for purity and righteousness in offerings made to God. This imagery reinforces the idea that offerings must come from a place of honour and integrity.
The use of “dog” in this context serves to underscore the seriousness of maintaining sanctity and avoiding defilement in religious practices. It reflects the broader biblical principle of honouring God with pure and acceptable offerings, free from taint or corruption.
10. Job 30:1
“But now they laugh at me, men who are less than nothing, whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock.” (ESV)
Job 30:1 uses the term “dogs” to illustrate the social and moral inferiority of those who mock him. The comparison highlights the extent of Job’s distress and the reversal of social status, with those who are now deriding him once considered beneath even his dogs. This vivid imagery underscores Job’s sense of betrayal and the dramatic shift in his circumstances.
The reference to dogs here reflects a deep sense of humiliation and degradation. It contrasts the respect once held with the current scorn, illustrating the profound impact of his suffering and the change in his social standing.
11. Psalms 59:6
“They return at evening, snarling like dogs and prowling about the city.” (ESV)
In this psalm, “dogs” are used to describe hostile enemies who exhibit aggressive and predatory behaviour. Their actions—snarling and prowling—illustrate the danger and threat they pose, capturing the sense of menace faced by the psalmist. The imagery of dogs conveys the intensity of the opposition and the constant threat experienced.
The depiction of enemies as snarling dogs amplifies the feeling of being under siege and the pervasive nature of the threat. It effectively communicates the fear and urgency in the psalmist’s plea for deliverance and protection.
12. Psalms 68:23
“That you may strike your enemies with the tongue of your dogs, the tongue of your enemies.” (ESV)
Psalms 68:23 uses the imagery of dogs’ tongues to symbolise the actions or words of adversaries. The verse reflects the idea of defeating enemies by their own words or actions, turning their aggression back upon them. This metaphor highlights the power of speech and its role in overcoming opposition.
The reference to dogs in this context underscores the concept of using one’s enemies’ tactics against them. It reflects a broader theme of justice and retribution, where the very means used by adversaries become the instrument of their downfall.
13. Matthew 15:26
“And he answered, ‘It is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.’” (ESV)
In Matthew 15:26, Jesus uses “dogs” metaphorically to refer to those outside the covenant community, contrasting them with the children (representing the Israelites). The imagery highlights the priority of addressing the needs of the children of Israel before extending blessings to others. This comparison serves to emphasise the importance of recognising the rightful order of divine provision and grace.
The use of “dogs” here conveys a sense of exclusion and prioritisation in the distribution of blessings. It reflects the broader context of Jesus’ ministry and the tension between different groups within the narrative.
14. 2 Samuel 9:8
“And he paid homage and said, ‘What is your servant, that you should show regard for a dead dog such as I?’” (ESV)
In this passage, Mephibosheth refers to himself as a “dead dog” to express his humility and unworthiness. The term signifies a state of extreme lowliness and insignificance, highlighting his sense of being unworthy of the kindness shown to him by King David. The imagery of a “dead dog” underscores the depth of his gratitude and sense of being an unlikely recipient of favour.
The use of “dog” in this context serves to emphasise Mephibosheth’s self-perception and the generosity of David’s actions. It reflects a broader theme of grace and humility in the face of unexpected blessings.
15. Proverbs 11:22
“Like a gold ring in a pig’s snout is a beautiful woman without discretion.” (ESV)
While not directly about dogs, this proverb uses animal imagery to convey a principle similar to the one found in passages about dogs. The comparison reflects the idea that certain qualities or attributes are misplaced or meaningless without accompanying virtues, much like a gold ring in a pig’s snout. The use of animal imagery helps to underscore the importance of discretion and propriety.
This imagery highlights the contrast between outward appearances and inner qualities, emphasising that true value lies in character and discretion. It serves as a reminder of the importance of aligning one’s external attributes with internal virtues.
16. Proverbs 23:20
“Be not among drunkards or among gluttonous eaters of meat.” (ESV)
Although this verse does not explicitly mention dogs, it uses animal behaviour as a metaphor for undesirable traits. The reference to gluttonous eaters and drunkards evokes the idea of excess and lack of self-control, traits that are often associated with negative behaviour. This metaphor reinforces the need for moderation and self-discipline.
The use of animal imagery here serves to illustrate the consequences of indulgence and excess. It highlights the importance of maintaining balance and avoiding behaviours that lead to moral or physical degradation.
17. Deuteronomy 23:19
“You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother, interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest.” (ESV)
While this verse does not mention dogs, it is related to the broader concept of ethical behaviour. The principle of not charging interest reflects a commitment to fairness and compassion, values that contrast with the negative connotations associated with certain behaviours, symbolised by dogs in other passages. This principle emphasises the importance of treating others with integrity and respect.
The absence of dogs in this context does not diminish the relevance of the ethical principle. It underscores the broader biblical theme of righteousness and the importance of upholding moral standards in all dealings.
18. Acts 13:50
“But the Jews incited the devout women of high standing and the leading men of the city, stirred up persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and drove them out of their district.” (ESV)
Although dogs are not mentioned directly, this passage illustrates opposition and hostility similar to that described in dog-related imagery. The actions of those who drove Paul and Barnabas out reflect a spirit of antagonism and persecution, akin to the aggressive behaviour associated with dogs. This metaphor highlights the challenges faced by early Christians in their mission.
The imagery of opposition and hostility, while not directly involving dogs, conveys a sense of the intense resistance encountered. It underscores the broader theme of facing adversity and the need for perseverance in the face of opposition.
19. 1 Samuel 17:43
“And the Philistine said to David, ‘Am I a dog, that you come to me with sticks?’ And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.” (ESV)
In this verse, Goliath uses the term “dog” to insult David, reflecting a sense of disdain and superiority. The comparison highlights Goliath’s view of David as insignificant and unworthy of serious challenge, using the imagery of a dog to express contempt. This moment underscores the dramatic contrast between the two figures and sets the stage for David’s eventual triumph.
The reference to “dogs” in this context serves to amplify the sense of Goliath’s arrogance and David’s humble position. It effectively contrasts the perceived worth of the challengers and the nature of their conflict.
20. 2 Samuel 16:9
“Then Abishai the son of Zeruiah said to the king, ‘Why should this dead dog curse my lord the king? Let me go over and take off his head.’” (ESV)
Abishai’s reference to Shimei as a “dead dog” is a way of expressing his contempt and desire to eliminate the insult directed at King David. The term “dead dog” signifies complete disregard and disrespect, reflecting the harshness of the situation. This imagery underscores the intensity of Abishai’s reaction and the perceived severity of Shimei’s actions.
The use of “dog” in this context serves to highlight the gravity of the insult and the strong response it provoked. It illustrates the dynamics of honour and respect within the narrative and the consequences of transgressing these social norms.
21. Proverbs 26:17
“Like one who takes a passing dog by the ears is he who meddles in a quarrel not his own.” (ESV)
This proverb uses the imagery of grabbing a dog by the ears to illustrate the danger and imprudence of involving oneself in disputes that do not concern one. The comparison underscores the potential for harm and the futility of such interference, likening it to a reckless and dangerous action. It serves as a warning against unnecessary involvement in conflicts.
The reference to “dogs” highlights the unpredictable and risky nature of such meddling. It effectively communicates the wisdom of avoiding entanglements in matters that do not directly concern one’s own interests.
22. Luke 16:21
“And desired to be fed with what fell from the rich man’s table. Moreover, even the dogs came and licked his sores.” (ESV)
In this parable, “dogs” are depicted as creatures that come to lick the sores of the poor man, illustrating both the man’s extreme poverty and the compassion of the animals. The imagery highlights the man’s destitution and the contrast between his suffering and the wealth of the rich man. It serves to underscore the social and moral lessons of the parable.
The use of dogs in this context adds a layer of poignancy to the portrayal of the poor man’s plight. It reflects the broader theme of social justice and the reversal of fortunes in the divine judgement.
23. Psalms 22:20
“Deliver my soul from the sword, my precious life from the power of the dog!” (ESV)
The psalmist uses “dog” metaphorically to represent enemies who threaten his life, invoking the imagery of a dangerous and predatory animal. The plea for deliverance highlights the intensity of the threat and the desperation for protection from these hostile forces. This imagery serves to amplify the sense of danger and the need for divine intervention.
The reference to “dogs” underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency of the psalmist’s plea. It effectively conveys the depth of the threat and the need for divine deliverance from those who seek to harm.
24. 1 Kings 21:19
“And you shall say to him, ‘Thus says the Lord: Have you killed and also taken possession? And you shall say to him, ‘Thus says the Lord: In the place where dogs licked up the blood of Naboth shall dogs lick your own blood.’” (ESV)
In this verse, “dogs” symbolise the dishonourable fate awaiting King Ahab for his actions. The prediction that dogs will lick Ahab’s blood in the same place they licked Naboth’s blood underscores the principle of divine retribution. This imagery reinforces Ahab’s punishment’s severity and prophetic judgement’s fulfilment.
The use of “dogs” in this context serves to highlight the reversal of fortunes and the justice of divine judgment. It reflects the broader biblical theme of accountability and the consequences of wrongdoing.
25. Psalms 68:13
“Though you men lie among the sheepfolds— the wings of a dove covered with silver, its pinions with shimmering gold—” (ESV)
While not directly about dogs, this verse contrasts the imagery of doves with the broader themes of purity and honour. The reference to wings covered with silver and gold serves to highlight the contrast between sacred and profane imagery, similar to the way dogs are used in other passages to signify impurity or undesirable traits. This imagery reinforces the value of maintaining purity and righteousness.
The comparison with doves emphasises the distinction between different types of imagery and their associated meanings. It reflects a broader biblical theme of purity and the contrast between the sacred and the profane.
26. Job 30:7
“Among the bushes they bray; under the nettles they huddle together.” (ESV)
While not explicitly mentioning dogs, this passage uses animal imagery to depict a scene of desolation and degradation. The reference to animals braying and huddling together reflects the bleak and chaotic situation experienced by Job. This metaphor highlights the sense of abandonment and the harsh realities of his circumstances.
The imagery of animals in this context underscores the contrast between the desolation experienced and the expected order of life. It effectively conveys the depth of Job’s suffering and the disruption of his once orderly life.
27. Jeremiah 15:3
“I will appoint over them four kinds of destroyers, declares the Lord: the sword to kill, the dogs to tear, and the birds of the heavens and the beasts of the earth to devour and destroy.” (ESV)
In this passage, “dogs” are among the destroyers appointed by God to execute judgement. The reference to dogs tearing and devouring reflects the severity of the divine judgement and the complete destruction awaiting those under God’s wrath. This imagery serves to highlight the thoroughness and intensity of the punishment.
The use of “dogs” in this context underscores the biblical theme of divine retribution and the various forms of judgement executed by God. It conveys the gravity of the consequences for disobedience and the extent of divine judgement.
28. Jeremiah 9:22
“Speak, ‘Thus says the Lord: “The dead bodies of men shall fall like dung upon the open field, like sheaves after the reaper, and none shall gather them.” (ESV)
Although this passage does not directly mention dogs, it uses imagery of uncollected dung and sheaves to convey a sense of abandonment and desolation. The reference to dead bodies and their exposure reflects the dire consequences of divine judgement, similar to the negative imagery associated with dogs in other passages. This metaphor highlights the severity of the judgement and the lack of honour in the aftermath.
The imagery serves to emphasise the completeness of the judgement and the absence of any redemption or recovery. It reflects the broader theme of divine retribution and the consequences of turning away from God.
29. Proverbs 30:17
“The eye that mocks a father and scorns to obey a mother will be picked out by the ravens of the valley and eaten by the vultures.” (ESV)
While this verse does not mention dogs, it uses the imagery of scavenger birds to symbolise the consequences of dishonouring parents. The reference to ravens and vultures serves as a metaphor for the severe consequences awaiting those who disrespect their parents, reflecting a broader theme of accountability and judgement. This imagery highlights the importance of honouring one’s parents and the severe repercussions of failing to do so.
The use of scavenger birds in this context underscores the finality and severity of the consequences. It reinforces the biblical principle of respecting and honouring family, and the consequences of failing to do so.
30. Revelation 22:15
“Outside are the dogs and sorcerers and the sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices falsehood.” (ESV)
Reiterating the earlier reference to “dogs” in Revelation 22:15, this verse lists them among those excluded from the holy city. The term “dogs” here symbolises those who oppose divine commandments and are unworthy of entering the sacred space. This imagery serves to emphasise the distinction between the righteous and the unrighteous and the purity required for entry into the divine realm.
The repetition of “dogs” underscores the seriousness of the exclusion and the importance of maintaining moral and spiritual purity. It reflects the broader biblical theme of judgement and the separation of the righteous from the wicked.
Conclusion
In summary, examining Bible verses related to dogs highlights important biblical themes of compassion and stewardship towards animals. Although the Bible does not focus extensively on dogs, it provides useful guidance on caring for and valuing all creatures. Reflecting on these verses helps Christians appreciate the importance of kindness and respect for their pets, strengthening the unique bond we share with them.
By applying these biblical principles, we can honour our faith and show love and responsibility towards our furry friends. These insights ultimately enhance our relationships with our pets and affirm our commitment to living according to our values every day.